Notes
Z-Boys had their own subculture within skateboarding. 12 boys from a part of L.A. known as Dogtown (S0uth Santa Monica, Venice, and Ocean Park). More run down and less economically sound. Know for outcast behavior. Created a new identity for surfing, and surf equipment and design. Warned away outsiders. The shop presented a home-like situation for people who typically only had one parent. Described themselves as similar to the Mofia. All wanted recognition. Demanding group of people. Everyone had to bring something to the table. Jeff and Skip were the leaders. Skating was the "after-surfing" activity. Skateboarding crashed in 1965.
I feel that this documentary is both a work of entertainment and an ethnographic study. It is an ethnographic study because it details the lives of this crew, what they represent, their insider language, etc. but is also entertaining for someone who is only looking at it for the entertainment value.
The interview subjects are the members of Zephyr and some of their followers. They are important because they best know how to describe the subculture. The interviews give the language and how different events and feelings are portrayed by different members of the subcultures. They are exactly what they say, word for word, and you can see it coming out of their own mouths. You can also view their mannerisms, facial expression and body language to give the interviews more meaning. They help keep the story interesting by feeding into each other and keeping it moving.
The attitudes of the subculture is very, "this is who I am and if you don't like it you can go screw yourself." They have a strong sense of loyalty and family with each other and they highly value "trash" (i.e. old swimming pools, the innovative ways in which they made their own skateboards, surf boards, etc.). They had a ritual of surfing every day until around 10, and then skating the rest of the day away. They also had individual jobs at the shop that they each had to do in order to keep it running. Artifacts could include surf boards, skate boards, their clothing and head band things.
The structure of the piece is very laid back. It is organized chronologically. It helps me understand how the subculture began and evolved throughout the course of time.
I believed that most skateboarders had similar attitudes to the "this is me, take it or leave it" attitude portrayed in the documentary. This stereotype was reinforced in the video. I believe that it holds true, because they bluntly said that this was how they feel and how they interact with others.
This did not really appeal to my pathos. However, it seemed to me that the person making the documentary was a fan of or at least interested in skateboarding. I feel as if it is credible, because it did not make any statements that were not believable. The piece appealed to logos because it stated beliefs and opinions that weren't farfetched. The people reporting on the subculture were really there and therefore they would be able to report on the subculture most accurately.